Despite my best intentions, it seems to have been a couple of weeks since my last update.
Quite possibly, its the altitude here in the Denver metro area that has befuddled me and left me off of my game. At least, that's a theory that Al Gore seems to believe in.
On the other hand....
Sometimes its just hard to muster the enthusiasm to blog when other projects are rolling along. Pulse of Battle is entering the final stages of final draft writing, prior to submission to my hardy band of editors. I've also been furiously painting Romans for PoB games (photo below).
Other than that, I've been doing a ton of reading on the Punic wars and the wars of the Successors. I'm drawn more and more to the Successor/Late Hellenistic era - quite the paper/rock/scissors of troop types and capabilities.
I've also been doing more and more in depth study of the Wars of the Roses, along with acquiring more books (!) on the era. The names and lineage of the key characters is slowly starting to sink in. You must forgive an American for confusion with all the names and titles!
I do find myself feeling that Richard III may have gotten the short end of the stick, so to speak, from the Tudor's PR machine. He's certainly and interesting character - I'm fascinated to see what comes of the archaeological dig purporting to have found his burial place.
On to the Broncos - Patriots game tomorrow! It is SOOOOOOO nice to have a REAL quarterback in a Broncos uniform again. Should be a great game, although I do believe that the Broncos have their work cut out for them.
That's all for now. I'll try to post more frequently.....
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Pulse of Battle Update
Hmmm. It appears that it has been a while since my last post. A couple of vacation trips, including our motorcycle vacation to the Black Hills, has been part of the cause for the blackout. Also - I've been using my writing time to instead focus on the writing of Pulse of Battle, the Field of Battle based ancients set of rules.
We played another set of test games last night - Republican Roman vs. Late Macedonian. The Romans won game 1, the Macedonians won game 2. Both games were played in one evening. Game 1 took 2 hours and game 2 took 1 1/2 hours. Both games came down to the wire, and were everything I'm looking for in a set - drama, tension, command decisions, and action. The games seem to have the balance of types and capabilities that I want, and ran smoothly. A handful of changes came up, but those were small tweaks.
At this point, the rules are written, and are in the "right before sending to editors" stage. With any luck, I can be "done" writing PoB in October/November.
A couple of photos from the game last night:
A completely disordered Phalanx!
Battle!
We played another set of test games last night - Republican Roman vs. Late Macedonian. The Romans won game 1, the Macedonians won game 2. Both games were played in one evening. Game 1 took 2 hours and game 2 took 1 1/2 hours. Both games came down to the wire, and were everything I'm looking for in a set - drama, tension, command decisions, and action. The games seem to have the balance of types and capabilities that I want, and ran smoothly. A handful of changes came up, but those were small tweaks.
At this point, the rules are written, and are in the "right before sending to editors" stage. With any luck, I can be "done" writing PoB in October/November.
A couple of photos from the game last night:
A completely disordered Phalanx!
Battle!
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Final Game in 1809 Campaign
This was game three in a three game 1809 French/Austrian Napoleonic campaign - played last Saturday night. The Austrians won a marginal victory in battle 1, the French had a crushing victory in battle 3, and the fate of the campaign hung in the balance for battle 3.
The French followed Marshal Rold's deployment to the "T". I think this created some initial opportunities for the Austrians as they exploited their superior deck and CiC (12+1) to set the tone and tempo of the battle. The Austrians closed on the French left, while holding their own right with a slim force of a brigade (Ed's) of Hungarian infantry and their 3 cavalry regiments.
Greg's Austrian assault at the hinge of the French line at the corner of the ridge near the French baseline succeeded in destroying half of the French artillery and creating a hole.....that couldn't be exploited. Greg's assault force was severely punished, and spent the rest of the game rolling to rally, it seemed. Meanwhile Chris closed with the largest Austrian infantry force on the far French left flank, and also deployed a grand battery on the ridge running across the width of the battlefield. Things looked bleak for Eric, the French commander of the French left.
General Shockey was perfecting the "ooze" assault method, as his strong force of French infantry and all the cavalry stumbled their way from the far French right to put pressure on Ed's troops. About this time, national Bavarian hero, John Mumby, launched an assault down the valley towards the remnants of Greg's assault force. This seemed to throw all kinds of kinks into the Austrian planning.
Chris methodically set about dismantling Eric's French - who gave as good as they got on the French left.
Ed launched his Hussars in a gallant attack down into the valley towards the Bavarian infantry's flank.....only to suffer a 3 UI loss from French and Bavarian artillery on the far ridge. So much for the Austrian cavalry trying anything aggressive from that point forward.
By this point, it looked like the Austrians had it in the bag. The French were down to their last couple of morale points, as Chris kept the pressure up on Eric's French.
Suddenly, out of the mist, from the land that time forgot - General Shockey's ooze assault burst onto the hill held by Ed's Hungarians. Before they could reach the Hungarians, the French surrendered their first chip to the Austrians!!!
The French hung on, not turning an Army Morale card, as Terry's assault mangled Ed's command.
At this point, the French were at 0 morale points, and the Austrians had 2!
Initiative to the French....first card - not an Army Morale card.
Next card.......Army Morale!!!!
Chris rolled the D12 for the Austrians and rolled an 8. OUCH.
Terry nervously picked up the D10 (for his CiC) and got ready to roll the test.....needing a 9 or 10 to continue, and possibly swing the morale points over to the French side.....he rolled an 8! Tieing the Austrian roll of 8, and ending the game!!!!
At this point, the Austrians won a marginal battle victory with 2 morale points left out of 24 at the game start. The French were at 0 out of 23 at the start.
So - for the campaign, the Austrians won 2 marginal victories, sandwiching the single crushing French victory.
The French started the campaign with 66 Campaign Points and ended with 12.
The Austrians started the campaign with 68 Campaign Points and ended with 3.
So - the Austrians won the battle count, but lost the campaign season due to the single crushing French victory!!!
We figured that the Austrians would happily quit the war and sign some meaningless treaty, while planning on renewing the war on the French at some future point. You've got to give the Austrians credit....they mastered the art of both quitting, and not quitting.
So - here are my overall thoughts on the campaign and the battle:
Campaign:
I'm happy with the battlefield selection process and the set up.
I really, really like the simplified post battle unit effect process, and REALLY like the post battle pursuit process. Simple and easy.
I kind of miss a campaign map, but I definitely didn't miss the work. Its enough work keeping the few records that were in this campaign.
As for the battle:
You're very optimistic if you hope to march a grand battery onto its position and deploy in time to do much of anything. The Austrians managed to, but had a great deck.
Don't roll a 1 for movement.
The Austrians never used their 12+1 CiC to help rally Greg's sole intact infantry unit and silenced artillery battery. I think the 1 in 12 odds of getting eliminated are offset by the much better chance of rallying with a D12+1 vs. a D8, and the addition of those 2 units in a healthy state would probably have forced John's Bavarians to think twice about coming down the valley.
Photos from the battle follow below:
The French followed Marshal Rold's deployment to the "T". I think this created some initial opportunities for the Austrians as they exploited their superior deck and CiC (12+1) to set the tone and tempo of the battle. The Austrians closed on the French left, while holding their own right with a slim force of a brigade (Ed's) of Hungarian infantry and their 3 cavalry regiments.
Greg's Austrian assault at the hinge of the French line at the corner of the ridge near the French baseline succeeded in destroying half of the French artillery and creating a hole.....that couldn't be exploited. Greg's assault force was severely punished, and spent the rest of the game rolling to rally, it seemed. Meanwhile Chris closed with the largest Austrian infantry force on the far French left flank, and also deployed a grand battery on the ridge running across the width of the battlefield. Things looked bleak for Eric, the French commander of the French left.
General Shockey was perfecting the "ooze" assault method, as his strong force of French infantry and all the cavalry stumbled their way from the far French right to put pressure on Ed's troops. About this time, national Bavarian hero, John Mumby, launched an assault down the valley towards the remnants of Greg's assault force. This seemed to throw all kinds of kinks into the Austrian planning.
Chris methodically set about dismantling Eric's French - who gave as good as they got on the French left.
Ed launched his Hussars in a gallant attack down into the valley towards the Bavarian infantry's flank.....only to suffer a 3 UI loss from French and Bavarian artillery on the far ridge. So much for the Austrian cavalry trying anything aggressive from that point forward.
By this point, it looked like the Austrians had it in the bag. The French were down to their last couple of morale points, as Chris kept the pressure up on Eric's French.
Suddenly, out of the mist, from the land that time forgot - General Shockey's ooze assault burst onto the hill held by Ed's Hungarians. Before they could reach the Hungarians, the French surrendered their first chip to the Austrians!!!
The French hung on, not turning an Army Morale card, as Terry's assault mangled Ed's command.
At this point, the French were at 0 morale points, and the Austrians had 2!
Initiative to the French....first card - not an Army Morale card.
Next card.......Army Morale!!!!
Chris rolled the D12 for the Austrians and rolled an 8. OUCH.
Terry nervously picked up the D10 (for his CiC) and got ready to roll the test.....needing a 9 or 10 to continue, and possibly swing the morale points over to the French side.....he rolled an 8! Tieing the Austrian roll of 8, and ending the game!!!!
At this point, the Austrians won a marginal battle victory with 2 morale points left out of 24 at the game start. The French were at 0 out of 23 at the start.
So - for the campaign, the Austrians won 2 marginal victories, sandwiching the single crushing French victory.
The French started the campaign with 66 Campaign Points and ended with 12.
The Austrians started the campaign with 68 Campaign Points and ended with 3.
So - the Austrians won the battle count, but lost the campaign season due to the single crushing French victory!!!
We figured that the Austrians would happily quit the war and sign some meaningless treaty, while planning on renewing the war on the French at some future point. You've got to give the Austrians credit....they mastered the art of both quitting, and not quitting.
So - here are my overall thoughts on the campaign and the battle:
Campaign:
I'm happy with the battlefield selection process and the set up.
I really, really like the simplified post battle unit effect process, and REALLY like the post battle pursuit process. Simple and easy.
I kind of miss a campaign map, but I definitely didn't miss the work. Its enough work keeping the few records that were in this campaign.
As for the battle:
You're very optimistic if you hope to march a grand battery onto its position and deploy in time to do much of anything. The Austrians managed to, but had a great deck.
Don't roll a 1 for movement.
The Austrians never used their 12+1 CiC to help rally Greg's sole intact infantry unit and silenced artillery battery. I think the 1 in 12 odds of getting eliminated are offset by the much better chance of rallying with a D12+1 vs. a D8, and the addition of those 2 units in a healthy state would probably have forced John's Bavarians to think twice about coming down the valley.
Photos from the battle follow below:
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Final Little Bighorn Post
Sorry for the delay in getting this final post up for the LBH battlefield tour. Real life has a way of intruding on blogging...
I'd like to finish with just a couple of photos from the Benteen/Reno siege area, and sign off with some random thoughts about the battle.
First up:
So much for controlling the high ground. This photo is from the northern end of Benteen's position, looking up and out toward Weir's Point. You can easily see how simple it was for the warriors to hunker down behind slopes and ridges and just pop off at the cavalry without exposing themselves.
View from weir's point toward Last Stand Hill (look toward the horizon, above the roadway, to the right of the area of trees around the visitor center). This is a photo zoomed in about 10X or so, giving an approximate perspective that Weir and others at this point would have had of the final stages of the battle on Last Stand Hill. Personally, I think any of their observations about seeing Indians doing this or that, or waving guidons, is entirely created after the fact based on what they found out after the battle. With dust from the battle, and the distances involved, I'm highly doubtful that they really saw much of anything that they could make out.
So - some random thoughts wrapping up my fantastic visit to the LBH battlefield.
1) If you ever get a change - GO! It is a great battlefield to visit, and very haunting. This is one of those battlefields that gives immediate enlightenment about the battle once you see the ground and visit the area. Highly, highly recommended.
2) Sheridan Wyoming as a short drive of about 60 miles to the battlefield. There are plenty of places to stay - we stayed in the new Hampton Inn and were very satisfied. I can't say much for the food in Sheridan, though. I spent almost $90 for a dinner for two (steak) at the "best" place in Sheridan, and the steaks tasted like mule hooves. Our second dinner in Sheridan was at Pizza Hut. Nothing fancy, and the place smelled slightly odd like all Pizza Huts, but the food was good and dinner cost $20.
3) I've read often comments like "if only Custer had taken the Gatling guns". Really? Really? How was he going to get them there? His pace would have been glacial, and he wouldn't have had a chance of catching up to the village. Additionally, the Indian warriors weren't stupid. They didn't fight like Zulus or Mahdists. Massed charges weren't a Plains Indian warriors "cup of tea", until they were certain that they would be successful. Let's assume that the Gatlings were there - most likely they would have been with Reno. OK, so what? I don't think he would have been dropping warriors like flies as they mindlessly charged the Gatlings. Most likely the warriors would have just spread out and enveloped the Gatlings and "boom", drop them where they stood. I really don't see much of an effect from the Gatlings on a highly dispersed target they would have been facing. These weren't WW1 Maxim guns, but Gatlings with a fairly fixed cone of fire.
4) Custer and his troops were exhausted on the day of the battle. I've ready many estimates that Custer might have only had an hour or two of sleep in 36 hours. I was up for 32 hours one time for work, and I can tell you - you're mind just doesn't work right. It takes much longer to make a decision, things don't sink in, and you almost feel numb. True, adrenalin would have kicked in for the troopers, but still - a bad, bad situation to put yourself into.
5) The distances on the battlefield were VAST. In my mind, the chief failure of Custer once he pitched in was to think there was ANY chance of Benteen making an appearance and affecting the battle. I'm not thinking about any person vendettas by Benteen slowing his approach, etc, but just the large distances involved and a simple time/motion study of how long it would take him to get to where Custer wanted him. It just wasn't going to happen.
6) I wonder if the 7th had been brigaded with an infantry regiment, or few infantry companies, possibly mounted, if things would have worked out differently. Indian warriors didn't like coming up against infantry ("long rifles") because of the long range of their weapons. An interesting "what if". I think the biggest issue is that the infantry would have slowed the column (see the Gatling discussion above).
7) In my opinion, Custer wasn't incompetent, and he wasn't an idiot. He was a fighter, and he finally got the target "cornered". He wanted to enhance his reputation, but he wasn't stupid enough to throw his life away on something he considered suicidal. I think the lack of battle preparation (rest, reconnaissance) led him to make some bad assumptions about the scope of what he was getting into. From the flow of the battle it looks like he was in tactical control until towards the end of the battle, looking for opportunities to dictate the tempo and flow of the battle. He just ran out of time and resources, and the final result was inevitable.
That's it!
I'd like to finish with just a couple of photos from the Benteen/Reno siege area, and sign off with some random thoughts about the battle.
First up:
Could it be Keogh's horse Comanche? No....just a free roving horse, looking for food from tourists on the path down to the Reno/Benteen siege site.
So much for controlling the high ground. This photo is from the northern end of Benteen's position, looking up and out toward Weir's Point. You can easily see how simple it was for the warriors to hunker down behind slopes and ridges and just pop off at the cavalry without exposing themselves.
View from weir's point toward Last Stand Hill (look toward the horizon, above the roadway, to the right of the area of trees around the visitor center). This is a photo zoomed in about 10X or so, giving an approximate perspective that Weir and others at this point would have had of the final stages of the battle on Last Stand Hill. Personally, I think any of their observations about seeing Indians doing this or that, or waving guidons, is entirely created after the fact based on what they found out after the battle. With dust from the battle, and the distances involved, I'm highly doubtful that they really saw much of anything that they could make out.
So - some random thoughts wrapping up my fantastic visit to the LBH battlefield.
1) If you ever get a change - GO! It is a great battlefield to visit, and very haunting. This is one of those battlefields that gives immediate enlightenment about the battle once you see the ground and visit the area. Highly, highly recommended.
2) Sheridan Wyoming as a short drive of about 60 miles to the battlefield. There are plenty of places to stay - we stayed in the new Hampton Inn and were very satisfied. I can't say much for the food in Sheridan, though. I spent almost $90 for a dinner for two (steak) at the "best" place in Sheridan, and the steaks tasted like mule hooves. Our second dinner in Sheridan was at Pizza Hut. Nothing fancy, and the place smelled slightly odd like all Pizza Huts, but the food was good and dinner cost $20.
3) I've read often comments like "if only Custer had taken the Gatling guns". Really? Really? How was he going to get them there? His pace would have been glacial, and he wouldn't have had a chance of catching up to the village. Additionally, the Indian warriors weren't stupid. They didn't fight like Zulus or Mahdists. Massed charges weren't a Plains Indian warriors "cup of tea", until they were certain that they would be successful. Let's assume that the Gatlings were there - most likely they would have been with Reno. OK, so what? I don't think he would have been dropping warriors like flies as they mindlessly charged the Gatlings. Most likely the warriors would have just spread out and enveloped the Gatlings and "boom", drop them where they stood. I really don't see much of an effect from the Gatlings on a highly dispersed target they would have been facing. These weren't WW1 Maxim guns, but Gatlings with a fairly fixed cone of fire.
4) Custer and his troops were exhausted on the day of the battle. I've ready many estimates that Custer might have only had an hour or two of sleep in 36 hours. I was up for 32 hours one time for work, and I can tell you - you're mind just doesn't work right. It takes much longer to make a decision, things don't sink in, and you almost feel numb. True, adrenalin would have kicked in for the troopers, but still - a bad, bad situation to put yourself into.
5) The distances on the battlefield were VAST. In my mind, the chief failure of Custer once he pitched in was to think there was ANY chance of Benteen making an appearance and affecting the battle. I'm not thinking about any person vendettas by Benteen slowing his approach, etc, but just the large distances involved and a simple time/motion study of how long it would take him to get to where Custer wanted him. It just wasn't going to happen.
6) I wonder if the 7th had been brigaded with an infantry regiment, or few infantry companies, possibly mounted, if things would have worked out differently. Indian warriors didn't like coming up against infantry ("long rifles") because of the long range of their weapons. An interesting "what if". I think the biggest issue is that the infantry would have slowed the column (see the Gatling discussion above).
7) In my opinion, Custer wasn't incompetent, and he wasn't an idiot. He was a fighter, and he finally got the target "cornered". He wanted to enhance his reputation, but he wasn't stupid enough to throw his life away on something he considered suicidal. I think the lack of battle preparation (rest, reconnaissance) led him to make some bad assumptions about the scope of what he was getting into. From the flow of the battle it looks like he was in tactical control until towards the end of the battle, looking for opportunities to dictate the tempo and flow of the battle. He just ran out of time and resources, and the final result was inevitable.
That's it!
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Last Stand Hill
Getting close to the end of posts on the LBH battlefield. In this post, I'll toss some photos of Last Stand Hill - easily the busiest of all locations on the battlefield. I'd guess that 95% of the visitors think the whole battle happened here....
Monument on Last Stand Hill. Little buckeroo courtesy of visiting tourists.
No Talk at the summit of Last Stand Hill...just a wee bit sunburnt!
The marker for the man himself, G.A. Custer.
I have NO idea why I can't get this photo oriented correctly. Grrrr. Anyway, this is a look at the markers on Last Stand Hill. The visitor center and cemetary ar off to the right, in the area with trees. Obviously, this wasn't there at the battle....
Another view in the same general area. The river is down the slope near the tree heavy area; the village was beyond the river. The distances involved are staggering - its a very eye opening experience to walk the battlefield after having only studied maps of the area.
Next time - the Reno/Benteen battlefield and random thoughts.
Monument on Last Stand Hill. Little buckeroo courtesy of visiting tourists.
No Talk at the summit of Last Stand Hill...just a wee bit sunburnt!
The marker for the man himself, G.A. Custer.
I have NO idea why I can't get this photo oriented correctly. Grrrr. Anyway, this is a look at the markers on Last Stand Hill. The visitor center and cemetary ar off to the right, in the area with trees. Obviously, this wasn't there at the battle....
Another view in the same general area. The river is down the slope near the tree heavy area; the village was beyond the river. The distances involved are staggering - its a very eye opening experience to walk the battlefield after having only studied maps of the area.
Next time - the Reno/Benteen battlefield and random thoughts.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
More LBH Battlefield Photos - Deep Ravine
The entire end of the LBH battle which ranged between Last Stand Hill and Deep Ravine is a confusing affair. Various theories exist about what happened when, etc. Indian accounts vary, and sometimes create even more confusion with timing and sequence. In very broad strokes, Custer and the regimental command element, plus C, E, and F troops were isolated on Last Stand Hill once Keogh's and Calhoun's commands were eliminated. Survivors of Keogh's and Calhoun's commands tried to make it to the hill; various scattered markers show how unsuccessful they were. Its truly sobering to stand on today's quiet Greasy Grass Hill and realize the terror and panic in the minds of those survivors as the warriors closed in.....its a chilling battlefield.
At some point, a substantial (40ish men) made for Deep Ravine. Was this an ordered attack by Custer to see if he could still break through to the village? Possibly hoping to link up with Reno, who "should" have been across the river pressuring the village? Was Custer dead at this point? Was the exodus to Deep Ravine a last desparate attempt to escape the slaughter? Common sense tells me that doesn't make sense....after all....why would you "escape" towards the village and the heaviest mass of warriors?
Anyway, some photos:
A view from Last Stand Hill down towards Deep Ravine (left in photo, toward trees). You can see the string of markers down the trail toward the ravine. The distances involved are truly staggering. 2000 warriors sounds like a LOT....until you begin to think of the enormous distances involved on the battlefield. But - if I was a trooper on Last Stand Hill....I would NOT go toward Deep Ravine unless ordered! I have a hard time believing it was an escape attempt, or a rout away from Last Stand Hill. That just doesn't smell right. Could the markers show deployments of a controlled skirmish line here and there? Maybe the markers show where troopers fell on their way BACK UP to Last Stand Hill after being ordered down toward the ravine to see if a crossing to the village was possible? Who knows....that's why this battle is so fascinating.
Looking toward Last Stand Hill, from the Deep Ravine trail. Many, many folds in the ground to shield warriors that closed out the battle laying down every conceivable type of fire on the area (arrows, repeating rifle fire, single shot muskets....).
Runs-Her-Man on the Deep Ravine trail, looking toward Last Stand Hill.
No Talk adopting a tourist pose further down on Deep Ravine Trail, with Last Stand Hill in the background.
Looking up the trail created down to Deep Ravine. Various markers dot the landscape as you look up to Last Stand Hill. Consider the isolation and sense of helplessness that troopers might have had if they found themselves in this position on that hot June afternoon.
Even farther down the trail. Note how far away Last Stand Hill is. It might as well have been on the moon.
Next time I'll add some photos of Last Stand Hill. I'll finish off with a couple of posts about Weir Point, and the Reno/Benteen battle area.
At some point, a substantial (40ish men) made for Deep Ravine. Was this an ordered attack by Custer to see if he could still break through to the village? Possibly hoping to link up with Reno, who "should" have been across the river pressuring the village? Was Custer dead at this point? Was the exodus to Deep Ravine a last desparate attempt to escape the slaughter? Common sense tells me that doesn't make sense....after all....why would you "escape" towards the village and the heaviest mass of warriors?
Anyway, some photos:
A view from Last Stand Hill down towards Deep Ravine (left in photo, toward trees). You can see the string of markers down the trail toward the ravine. The distances involved are truly staggering. 2000 warriors sounds like a LOT....until you begin to think of the enormous distances involved on the battlefield. But - if I was a trooper on Last Stand Hill....I would NOT go toward Deep Ravine unless ordered! I have a hard time believing it was an escape attempt, or a rout away from Last Stand Hill. That just doesn't smell right. Could the markers show deployments of a controlled skirmish line here and there? Maybe the markers show where troopers fell on their way BACK UP to Last Stand Hill after being ordered down toward the ravine to see if a crossing to the village was possible? Who knows....that's why this battle is so fascinating.
Looking toward Last Stand Hill, from the Deep Ravine trail. Many, many folds in the ground to shield warriors that closed out the battle laying down every conceivable type of fire on the area (arrows, repeating rifle fire, single shot muskets....).
Runs-Her-Man on the Deep Ravine trail, looking toward Last Stand Hill.
No Talk adopting a tourist pose further down on Deep Ravine Trail, with Last Stand Hill in the background.
Looking up the trail created down to Deep Ravine. Various markers dot the landscape as you look up to Last Stand Hill. Consider the isolation and sense of helplessness that troopers might have had if they found themselves in this position on that hot June afternoon.
Even farther down the trail. Note how far away Last Stand Hill is. It might as well have been on the moon.
Next time I'll add some photos of Last Stand Hill. I'll finish off with a couple of posts about Weir Point, and the Reno/Benteen battle area.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Calhoun's Hill
After failing to force a ford at Medicine Tail Ford, Custer's battalions came under increasing pressure from warriors starting to flood across the LBH river. The Troops fell back uphill onto the southern end of Greasy Grass ridge, generally aligning around/near the knoll that would become known as Calhoun's Hill.
This portion of the battle tends to be more confusing to me, as the only eyewitnesses were either the Indian scout Curley (who observed some of this action before skedaddling) or the Indian warriors themselves.
In general, I believe the battalion made its way to higher ground, with Calhoun's L Troop generally facing to the rear in the direction the Battalion had just come from. In effect, they were the rearguard of the Battalion, as the other Troops faced southeastward toward the river. Calhoun's L Troop appears to have been on higher ground, with other Troops deployed on lower ground toward the mass of warriors coming up from the river. Calhoun's L Troop seems to have been a rock of resistance, and stood their ground for some time. On the reverse slope of Calhoun's Hill (in general locational terms), Keogh's I Troop was placed as a reserve in waiting. At some point, Calhoun was overwhelmed by the volume of fire from the dismounted warriors, with a handful of survivors fleeing up Greasy Grass Ridge toward Custer's location near/at "last stand hill". Tom Custer's C Troop may have been somewhere between Calhoun's Hill and the warriors coming up from the LBH river, at some point moving on the lower slopes of the Greasy Grass Ridge to joing back up with GA Custer and the command element, along with F and E Troops.
I don't think that Keogh's I Troop put up too long of a resistance. I believe that after Calhoun was swamped, the attacking warriors swept over the hill and took I Troop in a hurry. The cluster of fallen markers for I troop doesn't look too much like an organized position to me, nor are they in a position that anyone would choose as a good defensive position.
Anyway, on to the photos!
A view from the approximate middle of Calhoun's position on Calhoun's Hill, looking up the ridge toward Custer's final position on "Last Stand Hill". You can see the monument on the knoll in the distance. The warrior's primary attack would have come up from behind the camera and to the left of the camera. Keogh's I Troop would have been off to the right corner down hill from L Troop. C Troop would have been downhill and to the left.
A view towards Keogh's I Troop. The markers for the fallen troopers are in the distance - look up from "Crazy" on the plaque.
A closer view of the markers. Note the handful of markers towards the left of the photo. I believe these would have been a handful of troopers either trying to escape towards Custer on Last Stand Hill, or possibly a small element dispatched by Calhoun or Keogh to make contact with Custer, before the end came for their Troops.
This portion of the battle tends to be more confusing to me, as the only eyewitnesses were either the Indian scout Curley (who observed some of this action before skedaddling) or the Indian warriors themselves.
In general, I believe the battalion made its way to higher ground, with Calhoun's L Troop generally facing to the rear in the direction the Battalion had just come from. In effect, they were the rearguard of the Battalion, as the other Troops faced southeastward toward the river. Calhoun's L Troop appears to have been on higher ground, with other Troops deployed on lower ground toward the mass of warriors coming up from the river. Calhoun's L Troop seems to have been a rock of resistance, and stood their ground for some time. On the reverse slope of Calhoun's Hill (in general locational terms), Keogh's I Troop was placed as a reserve in waiting. At some point, Calhoun was overwhelmed by the volume of fire from the dismounted warriors, with a handful of survivors fleeing up Greasy Grass Ridge toward Custer's location near/at "last stand hill". Tom Custer's C Troop may have been somewhere between Calhoun's Hill and the warriors coming up from the LBH river, at some point moving on the lower slopes of the Greasy Grass Ridge to joing back up with GA Custer and the command element, along with F and E Troops.
I don't think that Keogh's I Troop put up too long of a resistance. I believe that after Calhoun was swamped, the attacking warriors swept over the hill and took I Troop in a hurry. The cluster of fallen markers for I troop doesn't look too much like an organized position to me, nor are they in a position that anyone would choose as a good defensive position.
Anyway, on to the photos!
A view from the approximate middle of Calhoun's position on Calhoun's Hill, looking up the ridge toward Custer's final position on "Last Stand Hill". You can see the monument on the knoll in the distance. The warrior's primary attack would have come up from behind the camera and to the left of the camera. Keogh's I Troop would have been off to the right corner down hill from L Troop. C Troop would have been downhill and to the left.
A view towards Keogh's I Troop. The markers for the fallen troopers are in the distance - look up from "Crazy" on the plaque.
A closer view of the markers. Note the handful of markers towards the left of the photo. I believe these would have been a handful of troopers either trying to escape towards Custer on Last Stand Hill, or possibly a small element dispatched by Calhoun or Keogh to make contact with Custer, before the end came for their Troops.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)